Digitalising the Global Economy and the Future of State Sovereignty: Towards a Theory of Multi-layered Networked Sovereignty

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Political Sciences, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Ph.d Candidate in Political Sciences, Department of Political Sciences, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

This article examines how the digitalisation of the global economy, particularly within the Fourth Industrial Revolution, reshapes the meaning and exercise of state sovereignty in international politics. It asks how sovereign authority is reorganised through digital infrastructures, cross-border data flows, platform governance, cloud systems, technical standards, and transnational regulatory networks. The article adopts a qualitative, conceptual, and descriptive-analytical approach informed by network theory, and synthesises debates on digital sovereignty, infrastructural power, platform authority, data governance, fiscal sovereignty, digital taxation, and networked interdependence. It argues that digitalisation neither eliminates sovereignty nor leaves its classical territorial model intact. Rather, sovereignty is reassembled as a multi-layered networked capacity operating across infrastructural, rules-and-institutions, and legitimacy layers. The analysis shows that digitalisation can strengthen state capacity through regulation, public service delivery, cybersecurity, taxation, and infrastructure-building, while deepening dependence on private platforms, foreign cloud providers, external standards, payment infrastructures, and cross-border data regimes. Effective sovereignty in the digital economy therefore depends on states’ ability to secure critical infrastructures, shape rules and standards, manage platform power, diversify strategic dependencies, and sustain legitimacy across domestic and international arenas while preserving accountability and rights in digital governance.

Keywords


Aaronson, S. A. (2019). Data is different, and that’s why the world needs a new approach to governing cross-border data flows. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21(5), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-03-2019-0021
Afina, Y., Buchser, M., Krasodomski, A., Rowe, J., Sun, N., & Wilkinson, R. (2024). Towards a global approach to digital platform regulation: Preserving openness amid the push for internet sovereignty. Chatham House.
Ameli, S. R., & Haji Jafari, M. (2020). Digital economy. Tehran: SAMT. [In Persian]
Amer, M., Daim, T. U., & Jetter, A. (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003
Biersteker, T. J., & Weber, C. (Eds.). (1996). State sovereignty as social construct. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598685
Bietti, E. (2023). A genealogy of digital platform regulation. Geo. l. Tech. Rev.7, 1.http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3859487
Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & van der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed., with a new preface). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514
Chachko, E. (2021). National security by platform. Stanford Technology Law Review, 25(1), 55–140.
Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190246693.001.0001
Cordova-Pozo, K., & Rouwette, E. A. J. A. (2023). Types of scenario planning and their effectiveness: A review of reviews. Futures, 149, Article 103153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103153
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754
Cusolito, A. P., Lederman, D., & Peña, J. (2020). The effects of digital-technology adoption on productivity and factor demand: Firm-level evidence from developing countries (Policy Research Working Paper No. 9333). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9333
DeNardis, L. (2014). The global war for internet governance. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300181357.001.0001
European Parliament. (2021). Taxing the digital economy: New developments and the way forward (EPRS Briefing 698761). European Parliamentary Research Service.
Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00351
Gilson, L. L., & Goldberg, C. B. (2015). Editors’ comment: So, what is a conceptual paper? Group & Organization Management, 40(2), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115576425
Gorwa, R. (2024). The politics of platform regulation: How governments shape online content moderation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197692851.001.0001
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Jahangard, E. (2021). Digital economy: Analyses and dynamics (2nd ed.). Tehran: Amareh Publishing. [In Persian]
Jiang, M., & Belli, L. (Eds.). (2025). Digital sovereignty in the BRICS countries: How the Global South and emerging power alliances are reshaping digital governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009531085
Kahler, M. (Ed.). (2009). Networked politics: Agency, power, and governance. Cornell University Press.
Kaul, I., Conceiçao, P., Le Goulven, K., & Mendoza, R. U. (2003). Why do global public goods matter today. Providing global public goods: Managing globalization, 2-20.
Kausche, K., & Weiss, M. (2025). Platform power and regulatory capture in digital governance. Business and Politics, 27(2), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2024.33
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S., Jr. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Little, Brown.
Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823260
Larkin, B. (2013). The politics and poetics of infrastructure. Annual Review of Anthropology, 42, 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522
Mann, M. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 25(2), 185–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600004239
Musiani, F. (2022). Infrastructuring digital sovereignty: A research agenda for an infrastructure-based sociology of digital self-determination practices. Information, Communication & Society, 25(6), 785–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2049850
OECD. (2019). Measuring the digital transformation: A roadmap for the future. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311992-en
OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS. (2021). Statement on a two-pillar solution to address the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy. OECD.
Pohle, J., & Santaniello, M. (2024). From multistakeholderism to digital sovereignty: Toward a new discursive order in internet governance? Policy & Internet, 16(4), 672–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.426
Pohle, J., & Thiel, T. (2020). Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review, 9(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1532
Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton University Press.
Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25–40.
Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Crown Business.
Sheppard, L. R., Yayboke, E., & Ramos, C. G. (2021). The real national security concerns over data localization. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Taylor, R. D. (2020). Data localization: The internet in the balance. Telecommunications Policy, 44(8), 102003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102003
Törnberg, P. (2023). How platforms govern: Social regulation in digital capitalism. Big Data & Society10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231153808
UNCTAD. (2019). Digital economy report 2019: Value creation and capture – Implications for developing countries. United Nations.
UNCTAD. (2024).  United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2024). Digital economy report 2024: Shaping an environmentally sustainable and inclusive digital future. UN Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/publication/digital-economy-report-2024
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815478
World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1
World Economic Forum. (2016). Digital transformation of industries: Demystifying digital and securing $100 trillion in value for society and industry by 2025. World Economic Forum.
Wu, E. (2021). Sovereignty and data localization. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
 

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 16 June 2026
  • Receive Date: 31 December 2025
  • Revise Date: 06 June 2026
  • Accept Date: 16 June 2026
  • First Publish Date: 16 June 2026
  • Publish Date: 16 June 2026