Islam and Deliberative Democracy

Author

Political sciences, Faculty of Economics and Political Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Theories of Islamic Shuracracy (a theory of political system in Islam) on the one hand and Deliberative Democracy (a theory of political system in the West) on the other, can be considered as the main outcomes of recent intellectual developments in both Islamic and Western thoughts. This article, in addition to elaborating on, and comparing of these theories, seeks to reconsider the relationship between Islam and Democracy in order to propose the idea of compatibility between Islam and Deliberative Democracy. For the author, these theories are compatible in the sense that they accept the process of “deliberation” in making the main political and social decision. The adherents of these theories stress on consensus and mutual understanding instead of majority vote as the necessary criteria of legitimacy. These similarities rises the main question of this paper: What is the main cause of these similarities? Answering to this question, this paper tries to explain the recent intellectual developments in the Islamic thought in understanding Religion and in the West though in understanding Reason as the main epistemological resources of them.

Keywords


Abd a;- Khalegh, Farid, Fi al- Feghh al- Seyasi al- Islami, Cairo (1419). Daar al- Sherough. (Arabic)
- Abu Fares, Mohammad Abd al- Ghader, Hukm al- Shura fi al-Islam v Natigatuha (Arabic), Daar al-Furghan, 1987.
- Cohen, (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy", tr. Ali Asqar Sultani, journal of Farhang Andisheh, N.8. (In Persian).
- Cunningham, F (2002). Theories of Democracy, A Critical Introduction, (London and NewYork: Routledge.
- Dutwin, D. (2002). Can People Talk Policies?" A Study of Deliberative Democracy, Presented to the University of Pennsylvania for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
- Esfahani, Raqeb, Mujam Mofradat Alfaze Quran, Cairo (). Matbaah al- Ketab al- Mesryah. (Arabic)
- Fakhr al-Turayhi,Fakhr, Majmaa al-Bahrayn (1408). Maktab Nashre al- theghafat al- Islamiyah. (Arabic),
- Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communication Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society, tr.  T. Macarthy, London: Heinemann.
- Ibn Mokarram, Mohammad, Lesan al- Arab, IIV (). Beyrout: Daar Ehyae al-Turath al- Arabi. (Arabic)
- Rawls, J (1999). A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Revise Edition.
- Tabarsi, Amin al-Islam Ali al-Fazl ibn Hasan, Majmaa al- Bayan, (1404). Tehran: Naser Khosro, (Arabic)
-al-Shavi, Tawfigh Mohammad, Fegh al- Shura v al-Estesharah (1413). Cairo: Daar al-Wafaa Letabaah v al- Nashr. (Arabic).
-al-Shavi,Tawfigh Mohammad, al-Shura Aalaa Marateb al- Deymeghratiyah (1414). Cairo: al- Zahraa Leaalam Arabi. (Arabic).
-Green, P. (1993). Democracy (Key Concepts in Critical Theory), NewJersey: Humanities Press.
-Habermas, J. (1998). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
-Hiydar Ebrahim Ali, Hiydar, al-Teyarat al- Islamiyah v Ghazeyah al- Demeghratiyah(Arabic), Beyrout: Markaz Derasat al- Vahedat al- Arabiyah, 1996.
-Rawls, J. (). Justice as Fairness, in Contemporary Political Philosophy, an Anthology (ed.) Robert E. Goodin and Philip Pettit.
-Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Revised Edition.
-Seidman, S. (1989). Jürgen Habermas on Socity and Politics A Reader, Selection Translated From the German, Boston: Reaon Press.
-Shas al-Din, Mohammad Mahdi, Fi al- Ejtemaa al- Seyasi al-Islami(Arabic), Beyrout: al-Moasseseh al- Jameaiyah Lederasat v al-Nashr, 1421.
-Smith, Graham, Deliberative Democracy and the Envirionment, (2003). London and NewYork: Routldge.
Volume 2, Issue 2
2021
Pages 119-143
  • Receive Date: 17 October 2021
  • Accept Date: 17 October 2021
  • First Publish Date: 17 October 2021
  • Publish Date: 01 October 2021