Rethinking the Rentier states and democracy; comparative study of Saudi Arabia and Norway

Hasani Chenar, Seyedeh Roghayeh; Ajili, Hadi

doi:10.52547/jep.3.1.85

Rethinking the Rentier states and democracy; comparative study of Saudi Arabia and Norway

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ M.A in Ruhr Bochum University

² international relations, Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatab'i University

10.52547/jep.3.1.85

Abstract

Some researchers argue that oil incomes hinder democracy in oil-rich countries. Others believe that there is no correlation between oil and democracy. In this article, the author tries to compare the situation of democracy in two oil-rich countries(Saudi-Arabia and Norway). My main question, here, is that why the discovery of oil did not destroy democracy in Norway? I will argue that since the political system and political culture were democratic before the discovery of oil, it did not result in destroying the democracy in Norway. In contrast to Norway, neither political system nor political culture was not democratic in middle eastern countries like Saudia-Arabia. The state used the incomes earned through oil exports to suppress people, hence. A country like Norway was democratic before the extraction of oil and maintained its democracy after the discovery.

Keywords

20.1001.1.27171485.2022.3.1.4.1

References

- Akhbari, M. (2017). The role of fossil fuels in the world’s geopolics of energy, International Journal of Geopolitics, 48 (3):

- Baccaro, L. (2001). Civil society, NGOs, and decent work policies: sorting out the issues, International Institute for Iabor Studies, 127 (2):

Benedetto G, Hix S, Mastrorocco, N. (2020). The rise and fall of social democracy, American political science association, 114 (3):

Benli A., M. (2014). Rentier state theory and the Arab uprising: An Appraisal, Uluslararasi Iliskiler 42 (1):

Benghida, S. (2017). Norwegian oil management structure: Farouk Al-Kasim innovative solutions, International journal of civil engineering and technology, 18 (8):

Belbawi, H, Luciani, G. (2015). The Rentier State. London: Routledge.

Benedicte, T., Thurber, M. (2015). Norway’s evolving champion: Statoil and the politics of state enterprise”. Institute for International studies, 10 (9):

Cappelen, A., Mjoset, L. (2009). Can Norway be a role model for natural resource abundant countries. World Institute for Development Economic Research, 20 (23):

Cullen, R. (2011). The good oil. State roles in the Norwegian petroleum sector, Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics Society, 31 (7).

Eckstein, H. (1966). Division and cohesion in democracy: A Study Of Norway, Princeton: Princeton university press.

Fakhraei, P. (2019). Examining rentier state theory in the case of Iran before and after Revolution. The institute of oriental studies of the Russian Academy of Science, 16 (3):

Faudot, A. (2019). Saudi Arabia and the rentier regime trap: A critical assessment of the plan vision 2030, Resources Policy, 62 (10):

Gelb, A. (2000). Oil windfalls blessing or curse? London: Oxford university press.

Gray, M. (2011). A theory of late rentierism: in the Arab states of the Gulf”. Center for International and Regional Studies Georgetown University school of foreign service in Qatar, 13 (7).

Grendstad, G, Selle., P, Strosnes, K. (2009). Why greenpeace failed in Norway. Journal of Civil Society, 14 (1).

Gupta, S., Kumar, H, Toshniwal,. (2016). The resource curse play: A comparative study of Norway and Venezuela, Journal of Economics and Finance, 7 (5):

Helms, C. M. (1990). Arabism and Islam: Stateless Nations and Nationless States. New York: Diane Pub Co.

Iversen, T. (1998). The Choices for Scandinavian social democracy in comparative respective. Oxford University Press , 14 (1):

Larsen, E. R. (2006). Escaping the resource curse and the Dutch disease?. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 3 (65):

Mehlum, H, Moene, K. O, Torvik, R. (2011). Mineral rents and social development in Norway”. Memorandum, 4 (14):

Montagu, C. (2010). Civil society in Saudi-Arabia: The power and challenges of association. Middle East and North African Journal, 7 (9):

Niblock, T. (2006). Saudi Arabia (The Contemporary Middle East). London: Routeldge.

Okruhlik, Gwenn. (1999). Rentier wealth, unruly law and the rise of opposition: the political economy of oil states, Comparative Politics, 31 (3):

Qasem, I. Y. (2015). Oil and security policy: Saudi Arabia, 1950-2012, NewYork: International Comparative Social Studies.VOL: PAGES

Ross, L., M. (2001). Does oil hinder democracy?” .Cambridge University Press, 55 (3):

Saglie, J, Sivesind, K. (2018). Civil society institutions or semi-public agencies? State regulation of parties and voluntary organizations in Norway, Journal of Civil Society, 14 (4):

Shubert, S. (2006). Revisiting the oil curse: are oil rich nations really doomed to autocracy and inequality?”. Webster University, Institute for Human and Social, 10 (109):

Torgersen, U. (1967). The formation of parties in Norway: The problem of right-left differences. Institute for Social Research, 43 (2):