Hegel Philosophy and Human Freedom

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Western Philosophy, Philosophical Studies & the History of Science, IHCS, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

To define freedom as the absolute or Philosophy is a necessary prerequisite of understanding the political and social actualisations of freedom through history. According to Hegel’s articulation of philosophy, what makes philosophy a self-supporting realization of human freedom is that which is based upon the speculative thought (Speculation). Speculative thought is the process of philosophical actualization that is able to gather all contingencies within its own realm of freedom. Two approaches to interpret Hegel’s relation of philosophy and freedom are still dominant: First, the relation might be accepted as the enclosed totality of philosophy since Hegel’s practice of philosophy can conceptualize all actualized formations of reality; second, the relation might be criticized based on the supremacy of praxis over theory. In other words, the first approach considers philosophy as a closed totality; on the contrary, the second approach is based upon the supremacy of the power of unforeseen praxis over the power of interpretation. I attempted to propose a new way that would be another sort of reading Hegel’s understanding of the relation as a combination of unforeseen openness and an absolute totality at the same time. Accordingly, this article is a conceptual approach to explicate how philosophy is first and foremost able to conceptualize all historical realizations within its own totality as the last moment of the Absolute Spirit; second, how Hegel’s articulation of philosophy still remains a freely open totality to face new social and political realizations in the future.

Keywords


Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Edited by Allen W. Wood, Translated by H. B. Nisbet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). The Encyclopaedia Logic, Translated by T. F. Geraets, W. A. Suchting, and H. S. Harris Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Translated by A. V. Miller, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1971). Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind, Translated by. A. V. Miller, Oxford: Clarendon.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind, A Revised Version of the Wallace and Miller’s Translation, Translated By W. Wallace & A. V. Miller, Revised with Introduction and commentary by Michael Inwood, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1969). Hegel’s Science of Logic, Translated by A. V. Miller, Atlantic, Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Herder, J. G.V. (2004). Philosophical Writings, Translated and Edited by Michael N. Forster, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1989). Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose. in Kant Political Writings. Translated and Edited by H. S. Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malabou, C. (2005). The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic, Translated by Lisabeth During, London & New York: Routledge.
McRae, R., G. (1985). Philosophy And The Absolute The Modes of Hegel’s Speculation, Dordrecht / Boston / Lancaster: Martin US Nijhoff Publishers.
Pompa, L. (1992). Philosophical History in Kant and Hegel, in Hegel’s Critique of Kant, Edited by Stephen Priest, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, C. (1979). Hegel and Modern Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
 
 
Volume 3, Issue 1
2022
Pages 269-289
  • Receive Date: 07 June 2021
  • Revise Date: 12 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 09 May 2022
  • First Publish Date: 09 May 2022
  • Publish Date: 01 June 2022