International Journal of New Political Economy

International Journal of New Political Economy

Investigating the Impact of Water, Energy, and Ggreenhouse Gas Uncertainty on Investment Returns: Application of Fuzzy Regression: Iran Case Study

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Reza Ashraf Ganjoei 1
Mahboobeh Khadem Nematollahy 2
Teymour Mohammadi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Economics Department, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.
2 Ph.D of Econometrics, Faculty of Economics. Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
3 Faculty Member of Economics, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
10.48308/jep.2026.243351.1264
Abstract
This study employs a fuzzy logic-based approach to estimate the impact of uncertainty in key sustainability-related sectors—namely water, energy, waste, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and debt-to-capital ratio—on return on investment (ROI) over the period from 1993 to 2024. Given the inherently imprecise and dynamic nature of environmental and financial variables, fuzzy logic provides a robust framework to model vagueness and ambiguity in data. The analysis integrates longitudinal data across global markets, incorporating fuzzy sets to represent uncertain input variables and their nonlinear relationships with ROI. Results indicate that increased uncertainty in water and energy usage, as well as higher GHG emissions and waste production, negatively influence ROI, particularly when coupled with elevated debt-to-capital ratios. However, the application of sustainable practices that reduce these uncertainties can lead to more stable and higher investment returns. The findings offer strategic insights for investors and policymakers aiming to balance economic performance with environmental and financial risks. They also highlight the importance of investments needed to meet regulatory requirements, which are the main drivers for organizations at the financial level.

Highlights

  • Defines environmental and financial uncertainty as the lack of complete knowledge regarding the probability distributions of future outcomes; it further highlights how the compounded effect of these uncertainties, along with their temporal evolution, critically shapes long-term investment returns.
  • Demonstrates the advantage of fuzzy logic in capturing vagueness and expert knowledge, compared to traditional deterministic investment models.
  • Informs investors and policymakers on how multi‑sectoral uncertainties—when quantified and modeled robustly—can guide strategic decisions for sustainable and resilient investment planning.

Keywords
Fuzzy Logic
Environmental Variables
Return on Investment (ROI)
Uncertainty
  1. Adebayo, Y. A., Ikevuje, A. H., Kwakye, J. M., & Esiri, A. E. (2024). Green financing in the oil and gas industry: Unlocking investments for energy sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 12(4), 198-220.‏
  2. Agovino, M.; Matricano, D.; Garofalo, A. (2020). Waste management and competitiveness of firms in Europe: A stochastic frontier approach. Waste Manag. 2020, 102, 528–540.
  3. Ahmadi Orkomi A. Greenhouse gas emission inventory and quantifying regional compatible mitigation plans-horizon 2030 (case study: Guilan province, Iran). ijhe 2022; 15 (1) :121-136. (In persian)
  4. Ai, H., Frank, M. Z., & Sanati, A. (2021). The Trade‑Off Theory of Corporate Capital Structure. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. 1-65.
  5. Andries, P.; Stephan, U. Environmental innovation and firm performance: How firm size and motives matter. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3585.
  6. Asai, H. T. S. U. K., Tanaka, S., & Uegima, K. (1982). Linear regression analysis with fuzzy model. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybern, 12, 903-907.‏
  7. babaei, S., Amin Rashti, N. and Seifipour, R. (2016). The impact of Investment structure on environmental performance index (EPI) in oil countries. Majlis and Rahbord, 23(85), 169-198. (In persian)
  8. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.
  9. Cucchiella, F.; Gastaldi, M.; Miliacca, M. (2017). The management of greenhouse gas emissions and its effects on firm performance. J. Clean Prod., 167, 1387–1400.
  10. Eng, C.Y.; Yan, D.; Withanage, N.; Liang, Q.; Zhou, Y. (2019). Wastewater treatment and recycle from a semiconductor industry: A demo-plant study. Water Pract. Technol , 14, 371–379.
  11. Fu, C., Lu, L., & Pirabi, M. (2023). Advancing green finance: a review of sustainable development. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 20.‏
  12. Ghassemi, A., & Scott, M. J. (2020). Investigating the role of renewable energies in integrated energy-water nexus planning under uncertainty using fuzzy logic. In International Online Conference on Intelligent Decision Science (pp. 696-702). Cham: Springer International Publishing.‏
  13. Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1982). Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives. In J. J. McCall (Ed.), The economics of information and uncertainty (pp. 107–140). University of Chicago Press.
  14. Hassan, A. (2019). Do renewable energy incentive policies improve the performance of energy firms? Evidence from OECD countries. OPEC Energy Review, 43(2), 168-192.
  15. Houqe, M. N., Opare, S., Zahir-ul-Hassan, M. K., & Ahmed, K. (2022). The effects of carbon emissions and agency costs on firm performance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(4), 152.
  16. Jafari Samimi, A. and Ahmadpour, S. M. (2011). The Relationship between Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and Economic Growth in Developed Countries. Iranian Energy Economics, 1(1), 55-72. (In persian).
  17. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
  18. Khodadadi, V. and Janjani, R. (2011). The Relationship between Earning Management and Company Profitability in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Financial Accounting Research, 3(1), 77-96. (In persian)
  19. Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. The journal of finance, 28(4), 911-922.
  20. Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A state‐preference model of optimal financial leverage. The Journal of Finance, 28(4), 911–922.
  21. Lahouel, B.B.; Bruna, M.-G.; Zaied, Y.B. (2020) The curvilinear relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: An investigation of listed french firms using panel smooth transition model. Financ. Res. Lett., 20.
  22. Lee, S. K., Mogi, G., Kim, J. W., & Gim, B. J. (2008). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach for assessing national competitiveness in the hydrogen technology sector. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33(23), 6840–6848.
  23. Masoumi, M., & Sabetfar, P. (2016). Examining the relationship between debt ratios and corporate profitability. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management and Economics in the 21st Century. (In persian).
  24. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.
  25. Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.
  26. Nguyen, T., & Nguyen, V. (2020). The impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(4), 97–105.
  27. Noh, J. H., & Park, H. (2023). Greenhouse gas emissions and stock market volatility: an empirical analysis of OECD countries. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 15(1), 58-80.
  28. Ordoo S, Arjmandi R, Karbassi A, Mohammadi A, Ghodosi J. (2022). A managerial analysis of Iran’s renewable energy development strategies to reduce greenhouse gases and improve health. (2022). Iranian journal of health and environment; 14 (4) :643-664.
  29. OUCHNA, I. (2023). The impact of greenhouse gas emissions and green innovation on corporate investor’s financial performance: A systematic review. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 4(2-1), 237-249.
  30. Pérez-Pérez, J. F., Gómez, P. I., Bonet, I., Sánchez-Pinzón, M. S., Caraffini, F., & Lochmuller, C. (2024). Assessing Climate Transition Risks in the Colombian Processed Food Sector: A Fuzzy Logic and Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16055.‏
  31. Phillis, Y. A., & Andriantiatsaholiniaina, L. A. (2001). Sustainability: an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic. Ecological economics, 37(3), 435-456.‏
  1. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment‑competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, (9)(4), 97–118.
  1. Rezaei., Mohsen. (2022). A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Energy Prioritization, Environmental Energy and Economic Research 2022 6(1), 1-19.
  2. Robaina, M.; Madaleno, M. The relationship between emissions reduction and financial performance: Are Portuguese companies in a sustainable development path? (2019). Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 27, 1213–1226.
  3. Robati, M., & Rezaei, F. (2022). Evaluation and ranking of urban sustainability based on sustainability assessment by fuzzy evaluation model. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19(1), 625-650.‏
  4. Sajadifar,S. , Khashaei,M. , Ebrahimabadi,G. and Davoodabadi,M. (2019). Analyzing Productivity Indices for Urban Water and Wastewater Companies. Journal of Water and Wastewater; Ab va Fazilab (in persian), 29(6), 1-14. (In persian)
  5. Simionescu, L. N., Gherghina, Ș. C., Sheikha, Z., & Tawil, H. (2020). Does water, waste, and energy consumption influence firm performance? Panel data evidence from S&P 500 information technology sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5206.
  6. Xie, X.; Huo, J.; Zou, H. (2020). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 101, 697–706.
  7. Zheng, J., Jiang, Y., Cui, Y., & Shen, Y. (2023). Green bond issuance and corporate ESG performance: Steps toward green and low-carbon development. Research in International Business and Finance, 66, 102007.
  8. Zhou, J., Yin, Z., & Yue, P. (2023). The impact of access to credit on energy efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103472.
  9. Zhou, X., Wilson, C., & Caldecott, B. (2021). The energy transition and changing financing costs. Univ. of Oxford, 2022-02.

  • Receive Date 30 January 2026
  • Revise Date 02 June 2026
  • Accept Date 09 June 2026
  • First Publish Date 09 June 2026
  • Publish Date 01 August 2026