International Journal of New Political Economy

International Journal of New Political Economy

Economic Policy Uncertainty as a Driver of Volatility Dynamics in the Tehran Stock Exchange

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Master of financial management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph.D Student in Accounting, Caspian Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Management & Accounting, Shahriar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahriar, Iran.
Abstract
This research investigates whether fluctuations in economic policy uncertainty (EPU) are reflected in the volatility behavior of the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Using daily market information from January 2, 2015, to September 23, 2025, along with observations from 183 listed firms, the study develops an empirical framework to evaluate the interaction between uncertainty conditions and equity market performance. The analysis combines several econometric procedures, including ARCH diagnostics, GARCH-based volatility estimation, and GLS regression with an AR(1) adjustment, to identify the characteristics of market volatility and assess the role of EPU. The empirical evidence indicates substantial variability in the TSE index and confirms the existence of time-dependent variance behavior and persistent volatility effects, supporting the use of GARCH specifications. The results show that earlier market disturbances contain significant information for explaining future volatility movements. Furthermore, the estimated GLS model suggests that changes in EPU are associated with a statistically meaningful inverse effect on the dependent variable (coefficient = -0.3451; p-value = 0.0262), providing support for the research hypothesis. The analysis of the Sharpe Ratio also reveals differences in risk-adjusted outcomes across periods characterized by varying uncertainty levels. By focusing on an emerging financial market exposed to repeated policy changes, this study contributes empirical evidence on the interaction between uncertainty conditions and market volatility. The findings suggest that improving policy predictability, monitoring uncertainty indicators, and incorporating uncertainty measures into financial decision processes may help market participants better manage risk exposure.
Keywords

Bollerslev, T., Hood, B., Huss, J., & Pedersen, L. H. (2018). Risk everywhere: Modeling and managing volatility. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(7), 2729-2773. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy041.
 
Bomfim, A. N. (2003). Pre-announcement effects, news effects, and volatility: Monetary policy and the stock market. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(1), 133-151. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00211-4.
 
Bhowmik, R., & Wang, S. (2020). Stock market volatility and return analysis: A systematic literature review. Entropy, 22(5), 522. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/e22050522.
 
Brooks, C., & Persand, G. (2003). Volatility forecasting for risk management. Journal of forecasting, 22(1), 1-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.841.
 
Ghani, M., & Ghani, U. (2024). Economic policy uncertainty and emerging stock market volatility. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 31(1), 165-181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-023-09410-1.
 
Güngör, A., & Güngör, M. S. (2024). The nexus between economic policy uncertainty and stock market volatility in the CEE-3 countries. The South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 19(2), 60-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2024-0016.
 
Jakobsen, J. S. (2018). Modeling Financial Market Volatility: A Component Model Perspective. Institut for Økonomi, Aarhus Universitet. Print ISBNs: 9788793195684.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Kundu, S., & Paul, A. (2022). Effect of economic policy uncertainty on stock market return and volatility under heterogeneous market characteristics. International review of economics & finance, 80, 597-612. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.047.
 
 
 
 
 
Li, D., Zhang, L., & Li, L. (2023). Forecasting stock volatility with economic policy uncertainty: A smooth transition GARCH-MIDAS model. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, 102708. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102708.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liu, L., & Zhang, T. (2015). Economic policy uncertainty and stock market volatility. Finance Research Letters, 15, 99-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2015.08.009.
 
 
 
 
 
Markowitz, H. (1952). ‘Portfolio Selection, Journal of  Finance, The Journal of Finance , 77–91.
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x.
 
Mishra, A., Debata, B. (2020). Does Economic Policy Uncertainty Matter for Stock Market Volatility?. In: Mishra, A.K., Arunachalam, V., Mohapatra, S., Olson, D. (eds) The Financial Landscape of Emerging Economies. Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application. Springer, Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60008-2_4.
 
Mohamed Riyath, M. I., Pachiyappan, S., & Muhammed Rijah, U. L. (2026). The impact of economic policy uncertainty and market volatility on the India’s IT sector. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-04-2025-0139.
 
Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2012). Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices. The journal of Finance, 67(4), 1219-1264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01746.x.
 
Raunig, B. (2021). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Market Volatility: A Causality Check (Burkhard Raunig) (No. 234).
 
Roy, A. D. (1952). Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 431-449. doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1907413.
 
Salisu, A. A., Demirer, R., & Gupta, R. (2023). Policy uncertainty and stock market volatility revisited: The predictive role of signal quality. Journal of Forecasting, 42(8), 2307-2321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3016.
 
Tobin, J. (1958). Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. The review of economic studies, 25(2), 65-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2296205.
 
Zeng, Q., Tang, Y., Yang, H., & Zhang, X. (2024). Stock market volatility and economic policy uncertainty: New insight into a dynamic threshold mixed-frequency model. Finance Research Letters, 59, 104714. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104714.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 02 August 2026

  • Receive Date 08 December 2025
  • Revise Date 20 July 2026
  • Accept Date 02 August 2026
  • First Publish Date 02 August 2026
  • Publish Date 02 August 2026